Patient Safety and Abuse Prevention Act of 2009
March 22, 2009
As reported on McKnights.com, the Patient Safety and Abuse Prevention Act of 2009 (PSAP) was reintroduced to the Senate this week. The proposed law would expand upon a seven state pilot program that provides funding for nursing homes to conduct Federal Criminal Background checks on all nursing home employees.
Like many bills introduced in this first Congressional session of the Obama administration, this bill has been around the block a time or two. In its previous incarnation, the PSAP included a funding provision to conduct federal criminal background checks on potential residents as well as employees, but it appears that provision was dropped to make this new bill more palatable. This is probably a good “single-subject” modification, as background checks for employees and residents are truly different topics. And, screening employees with a Federal Criminal background check is too important for the bill to be defeated based on a parallel, but unrelated, analysis.
To illustrate the point, consider the following from an article in Modern Health Care:
“Forty-one states require criminal background checks on most aides prior to employment, but only half of those require criminal background checks at the federal level. In 2004, state agencies reported that they received more than 500,000 reports of elder and vulnerable adult abuse.”
This new version of the PSAP is really a funding bill, more than a mandate. Essentially, it would open up money, in the form of grants, tying with said money an admonition to conduct checks on all current and future employees, to nursing homes meeting a certain set of criteria (essentially those receiving Medicare money).
Personally, I am an advocate for this type of bill. Sure, there is already a huge amount of processin the Long Term Care hiring process. From CNA databases, state level criminal background checks and some Federal checks, hiring is a costly, and time consuming process. But, two arguments win out on the other side: 1) Such checks really will keep elders in LTC safe, or at least safer, from criminals moving from one state to another to work in LTC; 2) from a legal liability standpoint, such checks create a prima facie argument that a facility was not negligent in hiring.
Negligent hiring lawsuits have made hay in the past few years, and not only in health care. One benefit from so much mandated process in when hiring someone for LTC, is that should the worst happen – – should an employee harm a resident, the facility can insulate itself from the inevitable lawsuit by pointing out that a) the state and federal government require a lot of work from employers before they can hire an employee and b) by doing all of that work, the facility has done everything reasonable within its power to prevent just the sort of harm that has happened. The failure of this duty is what is at bottom of negligent hiring suits.
So, I welcome the reintroduction of the Patient Safety and Abuse Prevention Act. Hopefully, this bill will move swiftly through Congress and the president’s desk. The money from this bill will increase resident safety, and afford LTC providers another shield against the sword of negligence suits.